The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (15 - 17) vs. Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18)

€ 23,000
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (15 - 17) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
€ 18,200
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18) Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
€ 23,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 18,200

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 is 8.9 inches longer, 2.5 inches narrower and 1.8 inches taller than the Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp.
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (15 - 17)
69.3
80.5
57.8
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18)
71.8
79.3
69.3 in
Width
71.8 in
80.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.3 in
59.6 in
Height
57.8 in
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (15 - 17)
103.7
180.5
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18)
104.3
171.7
180.5 in
Length
171.7 in
103.7 in
Wheelbase
104.3 in

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
3219 lb
Curb Weight
2813 lb
4189 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4189 lb
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (15 - 17)
Weight Difference:
406 lb
12.61 %
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
CY0
Generation
DYB
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-three gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
3
1.8 L / 88 cu in
Displacement
1 L / 49 cu in
138 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
99 hp
at 6000 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
138 hp
99 hp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
130 lb‑ft
at 4250 rpm
Max. Torque
125 lb‑ft
at 1400 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
130 lb‑ft
125 lb‑ft
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
114 mph
Maximum Speed
115 mph
12.2 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

554 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8

62 mph 62
mph

571 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

 REPLAY
23.33 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
28.41 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
23.33 lb/hp
28.41 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Fuel Economy
36 mpg
combined
51 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
36 mpg
51 mpg
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
27 mpg
city
41 mpg
44 mpg
highway
60 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.6 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
14.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
556 mi
Range
743 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
556 mi
743 mi
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Environmental Impact
125 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
87.2 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
125 kWh
87.2 kWh
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
246 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
169 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
970 lb
Maximum Payload
1376 lb
8.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
10.3 cu ft
38.2 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
35.7 cu ft