The Comparative Analysis :
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo Automatic (12 - 18) vs. KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi (16 - 18)
€ 39,600

€ 30,100

€ 39,600
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 30,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo is considerably smaller in every dimension. It's 21.1 cm shorter, 5.5 cm narrower and 3.8 cm lower than the KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi.
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
1427
1805
2005
1465
1860
2120
1805 mm
Width
1860 mm
2005 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2120 mm
1427 mm
Height
1465 mm
2775
4644
2805
4855
4644 mm
Length
4855 mm
2775 mm
Wheelbase
2805 mm
Vehicle Weight
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
1540 kg
Kerb Weight
1590 kg
No data
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2070 kg

Weight Difference:
50 kg
3.14 %

General
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
ATS
Generation
JF
Saloon
Car Body Style
Saloon
Super Unleaded (98 RON)
Fuel Type
Diesel

Rear-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive

6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
GM 2.0L Ecotec Turbo I4
Engine Series
LTG
Engine Code

4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1685 CC
272 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Power
139 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
272 bhp
139 bhp
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
353 NM
at 1700 rpm
Max. Torque
340 NM
at 1750 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
353 NM
340 NM
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
Performance
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
149 mph
Maximum Speed
121 mph
5.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
82 m
0.000 sec

Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
62 mph
62
mph
mph
139 m
0.000 sec

KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
▶ REPLAY
5.66 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
11.44 kg/bhp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
5.66 kg/bhp
11.44 kg/bhp
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
Fuel Economy
34 mpg
combined
67 mpg
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
34 mpg
67 mpg
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
24 mpg
city
55 mpg
No data
motorway
76 mpg
63 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
477 mi
Range
1036 mi
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
477 mi
1036 mi
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
Environmental Impact
155.3 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
86.4 kWh
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
155.3 kWh
86.4 kWh
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
191 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
110 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 1.7 CRDi
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
No data
Maximum Payload
480 kg
381 L
Boot Capacity
510 L







No data
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
No data