The Comparative Analysis :
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo AWD Automatic (12 - 18) vs. KIA Optima 2.0 (13 - 15)
€ 42,000
€ 25,000
€ 42,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 25,000
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo is considerably smaller in every dimension. It's 20.1 cm shorter, 2.5 cm narrower and 2.8 cm lower than the KIA Optima 2.0.
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
1427
1805
2005
1455
1830
2030
1805 mm
Width
1830 mm
2005 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2030 mm
1427 mm
Height
1455 mm
2775
4644
2795
4845
4644 mm
Length
4845 mm
2775 mm
Wheelbase
2795 mm
Vehicle Weight
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
1605 kg
Kerb Weight
1498 kg
2130 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2000 kg
Weight Difference:
107 kg
6.67 %
General
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
ATS
Generation
TF
Saloon
Car Body Style
Saloon
Super Unleaded (98 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Permanent all-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
GM 2.0L Ecotec Turbo I4
Engine Series
LTG
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1999 CC
272 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Power
163 bhp
at 6500 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
272 bhp
163 bhp
KIA Optima 2.0
353 NM
at 1700 rpm
Max. Torque
196 NM
at 4800 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
353 NM
196 NM
KIA Optima 2.0
Performance
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
143 mph
Maximum Speed
130 mph
6.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
9.5 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
85 m
0.000 sec
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
62 mph
62
mph
mph
132 m
0.000 sec
KIA Optima 2.0
▶ REPLAY
5.9 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.19 kg/bhp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
5.9 kg/bhp
9.19 kg/bhp
KIA Optima 2.0
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
Fuel Economy
34 mpg
combined
40 mpg
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
34 mpg
40 mpg
KIA Optima 2.0
24 mpg
city
30 mpg
No data
motorway
50 mpg
63 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
466 mi
Range
621 mi
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
466 mi
621 mi
KIA Optima 2.0
Environmental Impact
159.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
132.6 kWh
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
159.2 kWh
132.6 kWh
KIA Optima 2.0
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
195 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
162 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
525 kg
Maximum Payload
502 kg
381 L
Boot Capacity
505 L
No data
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
No data
