The Comparative Analysis :
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo AWD Automatic (12 - 18) vs. KIA Optima 2.0 Automatic (13 - 15)
€ 42,000
€ 29,600
€ 42,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 29,600
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo is considerably smaller in every dimension. It's 7.9 inches shorter, an inch narrower and 1.1 inches lower than the KIA Optima 2.0.
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
56.2
71.1
78.9
57.3
72
79.9
71.1 in
Width
72 in
78.9 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.9 in
56.2 in
Height
57.3 in
109.3
182.8
110
190.7
182.8 in
Length
190.7 in
109.3 in
Wheelbase
110 in
Vehicle Weight
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
3538 lb
Curb Weight
3362 lb
4696 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
4409 lb
Weight Difference:
176 lb
4.97 %
General
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
ATS
Generation
TF
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Premium Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
Straight-four gasoline engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine (naturally aspirated engine)
GM 2.0L Ecotec Turbo I4
Engine Series
LTG
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
272 hp
at 5500 rpm
Power
163 hp
at 6500 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
272 hp
163 hp
KIA Optima 2.0
260 lb‑ft
at 1700 rpm
Max. Torque
145 lb‑ft
at 4800 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
260 lb‑ft
145 lb‑ft
KIA Optima 2.0
Performance
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
143 mph
Maximum Speed
126 mph
6.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.6 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
279 ft
0.000 sec
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
62 mph
62
mph
mph
482 ft
0.000 sec
KIA Optima 2.0
▶ REPLAY
13.01 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
20.63 lb/hp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
13.01 lb/hp
20.63 lb/hp
KIA Optima 2.0
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
Fuel Economy
28 mpg
combined
31 mpg
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
28 mpg
31 mpg
KIA Optima 2.0
20 mpg
city
23 mpg
No data
highway
39 mpg
16.6 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.5 gal
466 mi
Range
572 mi
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
466 mi
572 mi
KIA Optima 2.0
Environmental Impact
159.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
144 kWh
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
159.2 kWh
144 kWh
KIA Optima 2.0
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
314 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
285 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
1157 lb
Maximum Payload
1047 lb
10.8 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14.3 cu ft
No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data
