The Comparative Analysis :

Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic (Gasoline) (09 - 10) vs. Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo Powershift (15 - 18)

€ 25,900
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic (Gasoline) (09 - 10) Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
€ 46,400
 Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo Powershift (15 - 18) Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
€ 25,900
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 46,400

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic is slightly smaller in every dimension. It's 2.6 inches shorter, 1.7 inches narrower and 1.3 inches lower than the Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo.
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
57.1
Blueprint Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic (Gasoline) (09 - 10)
71.3
80.7
58.3
Blueprint Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo Powershift (15 - 18)
72.9
83.5
71.3 in
Width
72.9 in
80.7 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
83.5 in
57.1 in
Height
58.3 in
Blueprint Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic (Gasoline) (09 - 10)
106.3
189.2
Blueprint Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo Powershift (15 - 18)
112.2
191.8
189.2 in
Length
191.8 in
106.3 in
Wheelbase
112.2 in

Vehicle Weight

Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
3490 lb
Curb Weight
3525 lb
4288 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4982 lb
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic (Gasoline) (09 - 10)
Weight Difference:
35 lb
0.99 %
Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo Powershift (15 - 18)

General

Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
V250
Generation
BA7
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
Straight-six engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
4
Valves
4
6
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
137 hp
at 6400 rpm
Power
207 hp
at 3500 rpm
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
137 hp
207 hp
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
144 lb‑ft
at 4600 rpm
Max. Torque
332 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
144 lb‑ft
332 lb‑ft
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo

Performance

Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
129 mph
Maximum Speed
145 mph
9.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

453 ft
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic

62 mph 62
mph

361 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo

▶ REPLAY
25.47 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
17.03 lb/hp
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
25.47 lb/hp
17.03 lb/hp
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
Fuel Economy
29 mpg
combined
47 mpg
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
29 mpg
47 mpg
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
21 mpg
city
41 mpg
37 mpg
highway
52 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
17.2 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
16.6 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
493 mi
Range
783 mi
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
493 mi
783 mi
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
Environmental Impact
155.3 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
102.8 kWh
Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
155.3 kWh
102.8 kWh
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
317 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
209 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Chevrolet Epica 2.0 EcoLogic
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi Bi-Turbo
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
798 lb
Maximum Payload
1457 lb
13.6 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14.9 cu ft
No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data