The Comparative Analysis :
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T Automatic (13 - 14) vs. Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi Powershift (11 - 15)
€ 24,400

€ 27,100

€ 24,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 27,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T is 27.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 0.1 cm lower than the Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi.
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
1625
1836
2165
1626
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1626 mm
2760
4652
2648
4380
4652 mm
Length
4380 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2648 mm
Vehicle Weight
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
1550 kg
Kerb Weight
1550 kg
2200 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2050 kg

Weight Difference:
0 kg
0 %

General
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Diesel

Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive

6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Engine
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1362 CC
Engine Capacity
1997 CC
138 bhp
at 4900 rpm
Power
161 bhp
at 3750 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
138 bhp
161 bhp
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
200 NM
at 1850 rpm
Max. Torque
340 NM
at 2000 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
200 NM
340 NM
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
Performance
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
124 mph
Maximum Speed
129 mph
11.2 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
9.3 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
156 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
62 mph
62
mph
mph
129 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
▶ REPLAY
11.23 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.63 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
11.23 kg/bhp
9.63 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
Fuel Economy
40 mpg
combined
50 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
40 mpg
50 mpg
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
31 mpg
city
40 mpg
49 mpg
motorway
59 mpg
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
60 L
568 mi
Range
665 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
568 mi
665 mi
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
Environmental Impact
132.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
115.2 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
132.6 kWh
115.2 kWh
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
164 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
149 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Chevrolet Orlando 1.4T
Ford C-MAX 2.0 TDCi
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
650 kg
Maximum Payload
500 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
471 L








1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1723 L