The Comparative Analysis :
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 Automatic (11 - 13) vs. Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)
€ 25,400

€ 21,100

€ 25,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 21,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 is 27.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 0.1 cm lower than the Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT.
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
1625
1836
2165
1626
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1626 mm
2760
4652
2648
4380
4652 mm
Length
4380 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2648 mm
Vehicle Weight
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
1730 kg
Kerb Weight
1374 kg
2295 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
1860 kg

Weight Difference:
356 kg
20.58 %

General
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive

6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission
Engine
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1796 CC
Engine Capacity
1596 CC
139 bhp
at 6200 rpm
Power
123 bhp
at 6300 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
139 bhp
123 bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
176 NM
at 3800 rpm
Max. Torque
159 NM
at 4000 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
176 NM
159 NM
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Performance
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
115 mph
Maximum Speed
117 mph
11.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11.5 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
164 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
62 mph
62
mph
mph
160 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
▶ REPLAY
12.45 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
11.17 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
12.45 kg/bhp
11.17 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Fuel Economy
36 mpg
combined
44 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
36 mpg
44 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
26 mpg
city
34 mpg
46 mpg
motorway
54 mpg
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 L
503 mi
Range
534 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
503 mi
534 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Environmental Impact
149.7 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
121.2 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
149.7 kWh
121.2 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
184 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
149 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
565 kg
Maximum Payload
486 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
471 L








1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1723 L