The Comparative Analysis :
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12) vs. Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18)
€ 23,200
€ 24,000
€ 23,200
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 24,000
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD is considerably bigger in every dimension. It's 27.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 1.5 cm taller than the Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1625
1836
2165
1610
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1610 mm
2760
4652
2648
4380
4652 mm
Length
4380 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2648 mm
Vehicle Weight
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1655 kg
Kerb Weight
1405 kg
2287 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
1915 kg
Weight Difference:
250 kg
15.11 %
General
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
2
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1499 CC
128 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Power
104 bhp
at 3600 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
128 bhp
104 bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
315 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
270 NM
at 1750 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
315 NM
270 NM
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Performance
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
112 mph
Maximum Speed
114 mph
10.3 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.1 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
143 m
0.000 sec
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
62 mph
62
mph
mph
168 m
0.000 sec
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
▶ REPLAY
12.93 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
13.51 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
12.93 kg/bhp
13.51 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Fuel Economy
47 mpg
combined
74 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
47 mpg
74 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
36 mpg
city
66 mpg
58 mpg
motorway
81 mpg
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
53 L
663 mi
Range
867 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
663 mi
867 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Environmental Impact
123.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
78.2 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
123.4 kWh
78.2 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
159 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
99 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
632 kg
Maximum Payload
510 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
471 L
1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1723 L
