The Comparative Analysis :

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12) vs. Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12)

€ 23,200
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12) Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
€ 21,300
 Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12) Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
€ 23,200
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 21,300

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD is 27.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 0.1 cm lower than the Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
1625
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12)
1836
2165
1626
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12)
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1626 mm
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12)
2760
4652
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12)
2648
4380
4652 mm
Length
4380 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2648 mm

Vehicle Weight

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
1655 kg
Kerb Weight
1374 kg
2287 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1860 kg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12)
Weight Difference:
281 kg
16.98 %
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12)

General

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Ethanol
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1596 CC
128 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Power
118 bhp
at 6300 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
128 bhp
118 bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
315 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
159 NM
at 4000 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
315 NM
159 NM
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel

Performance

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
112 mph
Maximum Speed
115 mph
10.3 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11.7 sec
62 mph 62
mph

143 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD

62 mph 62
mph

163 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel

▶ REPLAY
12.93 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
11.64 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
12.93 kg/bhp
11.64 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
Fuel Economy
47 mpg
combined
33 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
47 mpg
33 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
36 mpg
city
25 mpg
58 mpg
motorway
41 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
663 mi
Range
402 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
663 mi
402 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
Environmental Impact
123.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
269.2 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
123.4 kWh
269.2 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
159 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
139 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Flexifuel
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
632 kg
Maximum Payload
486 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
471 L
1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1723 L