The Comparative Analysis :
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12) vs. Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (12 - 15)
€ 23,200

€ 23,900

€ 23,200
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 23,900
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. Both cars are the same height, but the Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD is 10.7 inches longer and 0.3 inches wider.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
64
72.3
85.2
64
72
81.4
72.3 in
Width
72 in
85.2 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
81.4 in
64 in
Height
64 in
108.7
183.1
104.3
172.4
183.1 in
Length
172.4 in
108.7 in
Wheelbase
104.3 in
Vehicle Weight
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
3649 lb
Curb Weight
3029 lb
5042 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
4101 lb

Weight Difference:
619 lb
16.97 %

General
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Minivan
Car Body Style
Minivan
Diesel
Fuel Type
Autogas (LPG)

Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive

6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission
Engine
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four engine (naturally aspirated engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
1.6 L / 78 cu in
128 hp
at 3800 rpm
Power
115 hp
at 6400 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
128 hp
115 hp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
232 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
103 lb‑ft
at 4200 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
232 lb‑ft
103 lb‑ft
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Performance
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
112 mph
Maximum Speed
115 mph
10.3 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.1 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
469 ft
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
62 mph
62
mph
mph
551 ft
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
▶ REPLAY
28.51 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
26.34 lb/hp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
28.51 lb/hp
26.34 lb/hp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Fuel Economy
39 mpg
combined
29 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
39 mpg
29 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
30 mpg
city
21 mpg
48 mpg
highway
37 mpg
16.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
10.6 gal
663 mi
Range
303 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
663 mi
303 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Environmental Impact
123.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
120.9 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
123.4 kWh
120.9 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
256 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
212 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
1393 lb
Maximum Payload
1071 lb
2.9 cu ft
Trunk Volume
13.3 cu ft








45.1 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
48.8 cu ft