The Comparative Analysis :
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14) vs. Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost (10 - 15)
€ 26,400

€ 23,100

€ 26,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 23,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD is 27.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 0.1 cm lower than the Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
1625
1836
2165
1626
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1626 mm
2760
4652
2648
4380
4652 mm
Length
4380 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2648 mm
Vehicle Weight
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
1659 kg
Kerb Weight
1385 kg
2309 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
1900 kg

Weight Difference:
274 kg
16.52 %

General
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive

6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1596 CC
161 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Power
180 bhp
at 5700 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
161 bhp
180 bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
360 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
240 NM
at 1600 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
360 NM
240 NM
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Performance
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
121 mph
Maximum Speed
135 mph
9.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.5 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
138 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
62 mph
62
mph
mph
118 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
▶ REPLAY
10.3 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
7.69 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
10.3 kg/bhp
7.69 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Fuel Economy
44 mpg
combined
43 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
44 mpg
43 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
34 mpg
city
32 mpg
52 mpg
motorway
53 mpg
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 L
621 mi
Range
518 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
621 mi
518 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Environmental Impact
131.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
125 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
131.6 kWh
125 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
169 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
154 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
650 kg
Maximum Payload
515 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
471 L








1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1723 L