The Comparative Analysis :

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14) vs. Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)

€ 26,400
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14) Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
€ 18,800
 Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14) Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
€ 26,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 18,800

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD is 27.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 0.1 cm lower than the Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
1625
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14)
1836
2165
1626
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1626 mm
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14)
2760
4652
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)
2648
4380
4652 mm
Length
4380 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2648 mm

Vehicle Weight

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
1659 kg
Kerb Weight
1374 kg
2309 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1860 kg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14)
Weight Difference:
285 kg
17.18 %
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)

General

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1596 CC
161 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Power
104 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
161 bhp
104 bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
360 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
150 NM
at 4000 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
360 NM
150 NM
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT

Performance

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
121 mph
Maximum Speed
112 mph
9.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.6 sec
62 mph 62
mph

138 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD

62 mph 62
mph

175 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT

▶ REPLAY
10.3 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
13.21 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
10.3 kg/bhp
13.21 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Fuel Economy
44 mpg
combined
44 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
44 mpg
44 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
34 mpg
city
34 mpg
52 mpg
motorway
54 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
621 mi
Range
534 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
621 mi
534 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Environmental Impact
131.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
121.2 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
131.6 kWh
121.2 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
169 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
149 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
650 kg
Maximum Payload
486 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
471 L
1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1723 L