The Comparative Analysis :

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14) vs. Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18)

€ 25,000
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14) Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
€ 24,000
 Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18) Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
€ 25,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 24,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S is considerably bigger in every dimension. It's 27.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 1.5 cm taller than the Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1625
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
1836
2165
1610
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18)
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1610 mm
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
2760
4652
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18)
2648
4380
4652 mm
Length
4380 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2648 mm

Vehicle Weight

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1655 kg
Kerb Weight
1405 kg
2305 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1915 kg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
Weight Difference:
250 kg
15.11 %
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18)

General

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission

Engine

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
2
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1499 CC
161 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Power
104 bhp
at 3600 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
161 bhp
104 bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
360 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
270 NM
at 1750 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
360 NM
270 NM
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic

Performance

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
121 mph
Maximum Speed
114 mph
10.3 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

143 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S

62 mph 62
mph

168 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic

▶ REPLAY
10.28 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
13.51 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
10.28 kg/bhp
13.51 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Fuel Economy
53 mpg
combined
74 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
53 mpg
74 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
44 mpg
city
66 mpg
60 mpg
motorway
81 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
53 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
751 mi
Range
867 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
751 mi
867 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Environmental Impact
109.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
78.2 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
109.1 kWh
78.2 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
139 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
99 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
650 kg
Maximum Payload
510 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
471 L
1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1723 L