The Comparative Analysis :

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14) vs. Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)

€ 25,000
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14) Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
€ 20,300
 Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14) Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
€ 25,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 20,300

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S is 13.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 5.9 cm lower than the Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
1625
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
1836
2165
1684
Blueprint Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1684 mm
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
2760
4652
Blueprint Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)
2788
4520
4652 mm
Length
4520 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2788 mm

Vehicle Weight

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
1655 kg
Kerb Weight
1477 kg
2305 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2135 kg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
Weight Difference:
178 kg
10.76 %
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14)

General

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1596 CC
161 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Power
104 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
161 bhp
104 bhp
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
360 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
150 NM
at 4000 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
360 NM
150 NM
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT

Performance

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
121 mph
Maximum Speed
110 mph
10.3 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
13.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

143 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S

62 mph 62
mph

188 m
0.000 sec

Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT

▶ REPLAY
10.28 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
14.2 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
10.28 kg/bhp
14.2 kg/bhp
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Fuel Economy
53 mpg
combined
42 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
53 mpg
42 mpg
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
44 mpg
city
33 mpg
60 mpg
motorway
51 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
60 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
751 mi
Range
557 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
751 mi
557 mi
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Environmental Impact
109.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
127 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
109.1 kWh
127 kWh
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
139 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
154 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
650 kg
Maximum Payload
658 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
600 L
1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1867 L