The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 Recharge T8 AWD Geartronic (20 - ..)

€ 30,000
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
€ 73,100
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8 AWD Geartronic (20 - ..) Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
€ 30,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 73,100

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 is 1.7 inches shorter, 3.8 inches narrower and 0.5 inches taller than the Volvo XC60 Recharge T8.
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
65.7
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12)
71.1
81.6
65.3
Blueprint Volvo XC60 Recharge T8 AWD Geartronic (20 - ..)
74.9
83.3
71.1 in
Width
74.9 in
81.6 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
83.3 in
65.7 in
Height
65.3 in
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12)
105.1
182.9
Blueprint Volvo XC60 Recharge T8 AWD Geartronic (20 - ..)
112.8
184.6
182.9 in
Length
184.6 in
105.1 in
Wheelbase
112.8 in

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
3638 lb
Curb Weight
4782 lb
5049 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5864 lb
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12)
Weight Difference:
1144 lb
23.92 %
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8 AWD Geartronic (20 - ..)

General

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
V
Generation
U
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drivetrain
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with automatic engagement
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid gasoline engine with gas turbine com­pres­sor
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2.4 L / 117 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
168 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
387 hp
at 0 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
168 hp
387 hp
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
171 lb‑ft
at 4100 rpm
Max. Torque
472 lb‑ft
at 0 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
171 lb‑ft
472 lb‑ft
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
118 mph
Maximum Speed
112 mph
10.4 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
5.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

472 ft
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4

62 mph 62
mph

249 ft
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 Recharge T8

 REPLAY
21.65 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
12.36 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
21.65 lb/hp
12.36 lb/hp
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Fuel Economy
25 mpg
combined
118 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
25 mpg
118 mpg
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
19 mpg
city
No data
31 mpg
highway
No data
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
396 mi
Range
2175 mi
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
396 mi
2175 mi
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Environmental Impact
178.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
37.8 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
178.2 kWh
37.8 kWh
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
360 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
85 g/mi (WLTP)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1411 lb
Maximum Payload
1082 lb
12.5 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14.3 cu ft
47.7 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
40.5 cu ft