The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12) vs. Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid Basis 4WD (15 - 18)

€ 37,500
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
€ 40,000
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid Basis 4WD (15 - 18) Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
€ 37,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,000

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ a little. The Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 is 2 inches shorter, 0.2 inches wider and 1.6 inches lower than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid.
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
65.7
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
71.1
81.6
67.3
Blueprint Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid Basis 4WD (15 - 18)
70.9
83.5
71.1 in
Width
70.9 in
81.6 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
83.5 in
65.7 in
Height
67.3 in
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
105.1
182.9
Blueprint Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid Basis 4WD (15 - 18)
105.1
184.8
182.9 in
Length
184.8 in
105.1 in
Wheelbase
105.1 in

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
3781 lb
Curb Weight
4220 lb
5049 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5159 lb
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
Weight Difference:
439 lb
10.4 %
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid Basis 4WD (15 - 18)

General

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
V
Generation
CW0
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission
No data

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2.4 L / 117 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
168 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
161 hp
at 0 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
168 hp
161 hp
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
171 lb‑ft
at 4100 rpm
Max. Torque
No data
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
171 lb‑ft
 lb‑ft
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
118 mph
Maximum Speed
106 mph
11.7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11 sec
62 mph 62
mph

535 ft
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4

62 mph 62
mph

502 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid

 REPLAY
22.51 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
26.21 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
22.51 lb/hp
26.21 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
Fuel Economy
26 mpg
combined
138 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
26 mpg
138 mpg
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
19 mpg
city
No data
32 mpg
highway
No data
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
11.9 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
409 mi
Range
1645 mi
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
409 mi
1645 mi
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
Environmental Impact
172.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
32.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
172.4 kWh
32.2 kWh
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
348 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
66 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 Plug-In Hybrid
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
1268 lb
Maximum Payload
939 lb
5.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
13.1 cu ft
47.7 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
45.4 cu ft