The Comparative Analysis :
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 Recharge T8 AWD Geartronic (20 - ..)
€ 37,500
€ 73,100
€ 37,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 73,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 is 4.3 cm shorter, 9.7 cm narrower and 1.2 cm taller than the Volvo XC60 Recharge T8.
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
1670
1805
2072
1658
1902
2117
1805 mm
Width
1902 mm
2072 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2117 mm
1670 mm
Height
1658 mm
2670
4645
2865
4688
4645 mm
Length
4688 mm
2670 mm
Wheelbase
2865 mm
Vehicle Weight
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
1715 kg
Kerb Weight
2169 kg
2290 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2660 kg
Weight Difference:
454 kg
20.93 %
General
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
V
Generation
U
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with automatic engagement
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with gas turbine compressor
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2360 CC
Engine Capacity
1969 CC
168 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
387 bhp
at 0 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
168 bhp
387 bhp
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
232 NM
at 4100 rpm
Max. Torque
640 NM
at 0 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
232 NM
640 NM
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Performance
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
118 mph
Maximum Speed
112 mph
11.7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
5.5 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
163 m
0.000 sec
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
62 mph
62
mph
mph
76 m
0.000 sec
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
▶ REPLAY
10.21 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
5.6 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
10.21 kg/bhp
5.6 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Fuel Economy
31 mpg
combined
141 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
31 mpg
141 mpg
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
23 mpg
city
No data
39 mpg
motorway
No data
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
409 mi
Range
2175 mi
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
409 mi
2175 mi
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Environmental Impact
172.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
37.8 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
172.4 kWh
37.8 kWh
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
216 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
53 g/km (WLTP)
Practical Convenience
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 Recharge T8
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
575 kg
Maximum Payload
491 kg
184 L
Boot Capacity
505 L
1686 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1432 L
