The Comparative Analysis :
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP (07 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 16)
€ 33,800

€ 43,400

€ 33,800
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 43,400
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP is 0.1 cm longer, 8.6 cm narrower and 4.3 cm lower than the Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance.
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
1670
1805
2072
1713
1891
2120
1805 mm
Width
1891 mm
2072 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2120 mm
1670 mm
Height
1713 mm
2670
4645
2774
4644
4645 mm
Length
4644 mm
2670 mm
Wheelbase
2774 mm
Vehicle Weight
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
1790 kg
Kerb Weight
1834 kg
2410 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2505 kg

Weight Difference:
44 kg
2.4 %

General
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
V
Generation
D
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drive
Front-wheel drive

6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Straight-four diesel engine with two turbochargers (biturbo)
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Code
B4204T11
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2179 CC
Engine Capacity
1969 CC
154 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Power
250 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
154 bhp
250 bhp
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
380 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
400 NM
at 2000 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
380 NM
400 NM
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
124 mph
Maximum Speed
130 mph
11 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.1 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
153 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
62 mph
62
mph
mph
99 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
▶ REPLAY
11.62 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
7.34 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
11.62 kg/bhp
7.34 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Fuel Economy
40 mpg
combined
42 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
40 mpg
42 mpg
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
31 mpg
city
32 mpg
49 mpg
motorway
51 mpg
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
533 mi
Range
649 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
533 mi
649 mi
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Environmental Impact
144 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
127 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
144 kWh
127 kWh
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
185 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
157 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
620 kg
Maximum Payload
671 kg
441 L
Boot Capacity
495 L










1686 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1455 L