The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) vs. Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR 4x4 DSG (17 - 18)

€ 40,100
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 41,500
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR 4x4 DSG (17 - 18) Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
€ 40,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 41,500

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP is slightly smaller in every dimension. It's 6 cm shorter, 7.7 cm narrower and 1.5 cm lower than the Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR.
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
1670
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
1805
2072
1685
Blueprint Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR 4x4 DSG (17 - 18)
1882
2087
1805 mm
Width
1882 mm
2072 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2087 mm
1670 mm
Height
1685 mm
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
2670
4645
Blueprint Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR 4x4 DSG (17 - 18)
2788
4705
4645 mm
Length
4705 mm
2670 mm
Wheelbase
2788 mm

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
1845 kg
Kerb Weight
1752 kg
2410 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2352 kg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
Weight Difference:
93 kg
5.04 %
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR 4x4 DSG (17 - 18)

General

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
V
Generation
NS
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
7-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2179 CC
Engine Capacity
1968 CC
154 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Power
187 bhp
at 3500 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
154 bhp
187 bhp
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
380 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
400 NM
at 1750 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
380 NM
400 NM
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
123 mph
Maximum Speed
130 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

174 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

62 mph 62
mph

124 m
0.000 sec

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR

 REPLAY
11.98 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.37 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
11.98 kg/bhp
9.37 kg/bhp
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
Fuel Economy
39 mpg
combined
50 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
39 mpg
50 mpg
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
31 mpg
city
43 mpg
46 mpg
motorway
53 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
63 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
511 mi
Range
687 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
511 mi
687 mi
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
Environmental Impact
150.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
117.3 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
150.2 kWh
117.3 kWh
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
192 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
150 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TDI SCR
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
565 kg
Maximum Payload
600 kg
184 L
Boot Capacity
650 L
1686 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
2065 L