The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)

€ 40,100
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 36,300
 Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11) Volvo XC60 2.0T
€ 40,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,300

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP is 0.7 inches longer, 3.4 inches narrower and 1.7 inches lower than the Volvo XC60 2.0T.
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.0T
65.7
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
71.1
81.6
67.4
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
74.4
83.5
71.1 in
Width
74.4 in
81.6 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
83.5 in
65.7 in
Height
67.4 in
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
105.1
182.9
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
109.2
182.2
182.9 in
Length
182.2 in
105.1 in
Wheelbase
109.2 in

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.0T
4068 lb
Curb Weight
4041 lb
5313 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5004 lb
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
Weight Difference:
26 lb
0.64 %
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)

General

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.0T
V
Generation
D
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Code
B4204T6
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2.2 L / 108 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
154 hp
at 4000 rpm
Power
200 hp
at 6000 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
154 hp
200 hp
Volvo XC60 2.0T
280 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
221 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
280 lb‑ft
221 lb‑ft
Volvo XC60 2.0T

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.0T
123 mph
Maximum Speed
127 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

571 ft
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

62 mph 62
mph

407 ft
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 2.0T

▶ REPLAY
26.42 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
20.21 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
26.42 lb/hp
20.21 lb/hp
Volvo XC60 2.0T

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Fuel Economy
32 mpg
combined
28 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
32 mpg
28 mpg
Volvo XC60 2.0T
26 mpg
city
21 mpg
39 mpg
highway
34 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
511 mi
Range
512 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
511 mi
512 mi
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Environmental Impact
150.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
161.1 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
150.2 kWh
161.1 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 5
309 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
319 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.0T
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
1246 lb
Maximum Payload
963 lb
5.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14 cu ft
47.7 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
41.2 cu ft