The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance Geartronic (19 - 20)

€ 40,100
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 46,100
 Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance Geartronic (19 - 20) Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
€ 40,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 46,100

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP is 4.3 cm shorter, 9.7 cm narrower and 1.2 cm taller than the Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance.
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
1670
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
1805
2072
1658
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance Geartronic (19 - 20)
1902
2117
1805 mm
Width
1902 mm
2072 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2117 mm
1670 mm
Height
1658 mm
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
2670
4645
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance Geartronic (19 - 20)
2865
4688
4645 mm
Length
4688 mm
2670 mm
Wheelbase
2865 mm

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
1845 kg
Kerb Weight
1771 kg
2410 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2370 kg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
Weight Difference:
74 kg
4.01 %
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance Geartronic (19 - 20)

General

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
V
Generation
U
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Code
B4204T31
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2179 CC
Engine Capacity
1969 CC
154 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Power
207 bhp
at 5000 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
154 bhp
207 bhp
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
380 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
300 NM
at 1700 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
380 NM
300 NM
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
123 mph
Maximum Speed
127 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

174 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

62 mph 62
mph

110 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance

▶ REPLAY
11.98 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
8.56 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
11.98 kg/bhp
8.56 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
Fuel Economy
39 mpg
combined
40 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
39 mpg
40 mpg
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
31 mpg
city
32 mpg
46 mpg
motorway
46 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
71 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
511 mi
Range
621 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
511 mi
621 mi
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
Environmental Impact
150.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
134.5 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
150.2 kWh
134.5 kWh
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC (WLTP) 36CH, 36CI, 36DG
192 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
190 g/km (WLTP)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T4 Polestar Performance
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
565 kg
Maximum Payload
599 kg
184 L
Boot Capacity
505 L
1686 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1432 L