The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (18 - 19)

€ 40,100
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 50,900
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (18 - 19) Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
€ 40,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 50,900

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP is 1.7 inches shorter, 3.8 inches narrower and 0.5 inches taller than the Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance.
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
65.7
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
71.1
81.6
65.3
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (18 - 19)
74.9
83.3
71.1 in
Width
74.9 in
81.6 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
83.3 in
65.7 in
Height
65.3 in
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
105.1
182.9
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (18 - 19)
112.8
184.6
182.9 in
Length
184.6 in
105.1 in
Wheelbase
112.8 in

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
4068 lb
Curb Weight
3904 lb
5313 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5225 lb
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
Weight Difference:
163 lb
4.01 %
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (18 - 19)

General

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
V
Generation
U
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Code
B4204T26
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2.2 L / 108 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
154 hp
at 4000 rpm
Power
250 hp
at 5500 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
154 hp
250 hp
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
280 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
295 lb‑ft
at 1800 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
280 lb‑ft
295 lb‑ft
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
123 mph
Maximum Speed
130 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
6.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

571 ft
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

62 mph 62
mph

315 ft
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance

 REPLAY
26.42 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
15.62 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
26.42 lb/hp
15.62 lb/hp
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Fuel Economy
32 mpg
combined
33 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
32 mpg
33 mpg
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
26 mpg
city
26 mpg
39 mpg
highway
39 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.8 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
511 mi
Range
621 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
511 mi
621 mi
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Environmental Impact
150.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
134.5 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
150.2 kWh
134.5 kWh
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
309 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
306 g/mi (WLTP)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
1246 lb
Maximum Payload
1321 lb
5.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14.3 cu ft
47.7 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
40.5 cu ft