The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18)

€ 40,100
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 67,000
 Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18) Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
€ 40,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 67,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP is 4.3 cm shorter, 9.7 cm narrower and 1.2 cm taller than the Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine.
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
1670
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
1805
2072
1658
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18)
1902
2117
1805 mm
Width
1902 mm
2072 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2117 mm
1670 mm
Height
1658 mm
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
2670
4645
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18)
2865
4688
4645 mm
Length
4688 mm
2670 mm
Wheelbase
2865 mm

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
1845 kg
Kerb Weight
2195 kg
2410 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2660 kg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
Weight Difference:
350 kg
15.95 %
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18)

General

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
V
Generation
U
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with automatic engagement
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
Engine Type
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with gas turbine com­pres­sor
Engine Code
B4204T35
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2179 CC
Engine Capacity
1969 CC
154 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Power
387 bhp
at 0 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
154 bhp
387 bhp
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
380 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
640 NM
at 0 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
380 NM
640 NM
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
123 mph
Maximum Speed
143 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
5.3 sec
62 mph 62
mph

174 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

62 mph 62
mph

74 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine

▶ REPLAY
11.98 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
5.67 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
11.98 kg/bhp
5.67 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Fuel Economy
39 mpg
combined
135 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
39 mpg
135 mpg
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
31 mpg
city
No data
46 mpg
motorway
No data
Kraftstoffanzeige
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
50 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
511 mi
Range
1479 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
511 mi
1479 mi
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Environmental Impact
150.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
39.8 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
150.2 kWh
39.8 kWh
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
192 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
49 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
565 kg
Maximum Payload
465 kg
184 L
Boot Capacity
505 L
1686 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1432 L