The Comparative Analysis :

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18) vs. Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)

€ 24,000
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18) Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
€ 25,000
 Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14) Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
€ 24,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 25,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic is considerably smaller in every dimension. It's 27.2 cm shorter, 0.8 cm narrower and 1.5 cm lower than the Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S.
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
1610
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18)
1828
2067
1625
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
1836
2165
1828 mm
Width
1836 mm
2067 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2165 mm
1610 mm
Height
1625 mm
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18)
2648
4380
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
2760
4652
4380 mm
Length
4652 mm
2648 mm
Wheelbase
2760 mm

Vehicle Weight

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
1405 kg
Kerb Weight
1655 kg
1915 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2305 kg
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (15 - 18)
Weight Difference:
250 kg
15.11 %
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)

General

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
DXA
Generation
KL1Y
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission

Engine

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
2
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1499 CC
Engine Capacity
1998 CC
104 bhp
at 3600 rpm
Power
161 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
104 bhp
161 bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
270 NM
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
360 NM
at 2000 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
270 NM
360 NM
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S

Performance

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
114 mph
Maximum Speed
121 mph
12.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.3 sec
62 mph 62
mph

168 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic

62 mph 62
mph

143 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S

▶ REPLAY
13.51 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
10.28 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
13.51 kg/bhp
10.28 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Fuel Economy
74 mpg
combined
53 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
74 mpg
53 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
66 mpg
city
44 mpg
81 mpg
motorway
60 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
53 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
64 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
867 mi
Range
751 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
867 mi
751 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Environmental Impact
78.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
109.1 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
78.2 kWh
109.1 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 5
99 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
139 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford C-MAX 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
510 kg
Maximum Payload
650 kg
471 L
Boot Capacity
101 L
1723 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1594 L