The Comparative Analysis :
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost (10 - 15) vs. Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12)
€ 23,100
€ 24,200
€ 23,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 24,200
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. Both cars are the same height, but the Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost is 10.7 inches shorter and 0.3 inches narrower.
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
64
72
81.4
64
72.3
85.2
72 in
Width
72.3 in
81.4 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
85.2 in
64 in
Height
64 in
104.3
172.4
108.7
183.1
172.4 in
Length
183.1 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
108.7 in
Vehicle Weight
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
3053 lb
Curb Weight
3649 lb
4189 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
5042 lb
Weight Difference:
595 lb
16.31 %
General
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
DXA
Generation
KL1Y
Minivan
Car Body Style
Minivan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Straight-four gasoline engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.6 L / 78 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
180 hp
at 5700 rpm
Power
161 hp
at 3800 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
180 hp
161 hp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
177 lb‑ft
at 1600 rpm
Max. Torque
266 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
177 lb‑ft
266 lb‑ft
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Performance
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
135 mph
Maximum Speed
121 mph
8.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
387 ft
0.000 sec
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
62 mph
62
mph
mph
456 ft
0.000 sec
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
▶ REPLAY
16.96 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
22.66 lb/hp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
16.96 lb/hp
22.66 lb/hp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Fuel Economy
36 mpg
combined
39 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
36 mpg
39 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
27 mpg
city
30 mpg
44 mpg
highway
48 mpg
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
16.9 gal
518 mi
Range
663 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
518 mi
663 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Environmental Impact
125 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
123.4 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
125 kWh
123.4 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
248 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
256 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
1135 lb
Maximum Payload
1393 lb
13.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
2.9 cu ft
48.8 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
45.1 cu ft
