The Comparative Analysis :
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost (10 - 15) vs. Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14)
€ 23,100

€ 26,400

€ 23,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 26,400
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost is 27.2 cm shorter, 0.8 cm narrower and 0.1 cm taller than the Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD.
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
1626
1828
2067
1625
1836
2165
1828 mm
Width
1836 mm
2067 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2165 mm
1626 mm
Height
1625 mm
2648
4380
2760
4652
4380 mm
Length
4652 mm
2648 mm
Wheelbase
2760 mm
Vehicle Weight
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
1385 kg
Kerb Weight
1659 kg
1900 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2309 kg

Weight Difference:
274 kg
16.52 %

General
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
DXA
Generation
KL1Y
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Diesel

Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive

6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1596 CC
Engine Capacity
1998 CC
180 bhp
at 5700 rpm
Power
161 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
180 bhp
161 bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
240 NM
at 1600 rpm
Max. Torque
360 NM
at 2000 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
240 NM
360 NM
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Performance
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
135 mph
Maximum Speed
121 mph
8.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
9.9 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
118 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
62 mph
62
mph
mph
138 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
▶ REPLAY
7.69 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
10.3 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
7.69 kg/bhp
10.3 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Fuel Economy
43 mpg
combined
44 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
43 mpg
44 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
32 mpg
city
34 mpg
53 mpg
motorway
52 mpg
55 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
64 L
518 mi
Range
621 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
518 mi
621 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Environmental Impact
125 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
131.6 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
125 kWh
131.6 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
154 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
169 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford C-MAX 1.6 EcoBoost
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
515 kg
Maximum Payload
650 kg
471 L
Boot Capacity
101 L








1723 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1594 L