The Comparative Analysis :
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14) vs. Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12)
€ 18,800

€ 23,200

€ 18,800
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 23,200
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT is 27.2 cm shorter, 0.8 cm narrower and 0.1 cm taller than the Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD.
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
1626
1828
2067
1625
1836
2165
1828 mm
Width
1836 mm
2067 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2165 mm
1626 mm
Height
1625 mm
2648
4380
2760
4652
4380 mm
Length
4652 mm
2648 mm
Wheelbase
2760 mm
Vehicle Weight
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
1374 kg
Kerb Weight
1655 kg
1860 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2287 kg

Weight Difference:
281 kg
16.98 %

General
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
DXA
Generation
KL1Y
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Diesel

Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive

5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1596 CC
Engine Capacity
1998 CC
104 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
128 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
104 bhp
128 bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
150 NM
at 4000 rpm
Max. Torque
315 NM
at 2000 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
150 NM
315 NM
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Performance
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
112 mph
Maximum Speed
112 mph
12.6 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.3 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
175 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
62 mph
62
mph
mph
143 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
▶ REPLAY
13.21 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
12.93 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
13.21 kg/bhp
12.93 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Fuel Economy
44 mpg
combined
47 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
44 mpg
47 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
34 mpg
city
36 mpg
54 mpg
motorway
58 mpg
55 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
64 L
534 mi
Range
663 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
534 mi
663 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Environmental Impact
121.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
123.4 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
121.2 kWh
123.4 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
149 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
159 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
486 kg
Maximum Payload
632 kg
471 L
Boot Capacity
101 L








1723 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1594 L