The Comparative Analysis :
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (10 - 14) vs. Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD (11 - 12)
€ 21,100
€ 23,200
€ 21,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 23,200
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. Both cars are the same height, but the Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT is 10.7 inches shorter and 0.3 inches narrower.
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
64
72
81.4
64
72.3
85.2
72 in
Width
72.3 in
81.4 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
85.2 in
64 in
Height
64 in
104.3
172.4
108.7
183.1
172.4 in
Length
183.1 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
108.7 in
Vehicle Weight
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
3029 lb
Curb Weight
3649 lb
4101 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
5042 lb
Weight Difference:
619 lb
16.97 %
General
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
DXA
Generation
KL1Y
Minivan
Car Body Style
Minivan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Straight-four gasoline engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.6 L / 78 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
123 hp
at 6300 rpm
Power
128 hp
at 3800 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
123 hp
128 hp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
117 lb‑ft
at 4000 rpm
Max. Torque
232 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
117 lb‑ft
232 lb‑ft
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Performance
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
117 mph
Maximum Speed
112 mph
11.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.3 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
525 ft
0.000 sec
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
62 mph
62
mph
mph
469 ft
0.000 sec
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
▶ REPLAY
24.63 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
28.51 lb/hp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
24.63 lb/hp
28.51 lb/hp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Fuel Economy
37 mpg
combined
39 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
37 mpg
39 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
28 mpg
city
30 mpg
45 mpg
highway
48 mpg
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
16.9 gal
534 mi
Range
663 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
534 mi
663 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Environmental Impact
121.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
123.4 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
121.2 kWh
123.4 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
240 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
256 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
1071 lb
Maximum Payload
1393 lb
13.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
2.9 cu ft
48.8 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
45.1 cu ft
