The Comparative Analysis :
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT (15 - 18) vs. Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S (12 - 14)
€ 18,300

€ 25,000

€ 18,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 25,000
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT is considerably smaller in every dimension. It's 10.7 inches shorter, 0.3 inches narrower and 0.6 inches lower than the Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S.
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
63.4
72
81.4
64
72.3
85.2
72 in
Width
72.3 in
81.4 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
85.2 in
63.4 in
Height
64 in
104.3
172.4
108.7
183.1
172.4 in
Length
183.1 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
108.7 in
Vehicle Weight
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
3029 lb
Curb Weight
3649 lb
4101 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
5082 lb

Weight Difference:
619 lb
16.97 %

General
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
DXA
Generation
KL1Y
Minivan
Car Body Style
Minivan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel

Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive

5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Straight-four gasoline engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.6 L / 78 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
84 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
161 hp
at 3800 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
84 hp
161 hp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
111 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Max. Torque
266 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
111 lb‑ft
266 lb‑ft
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Performance
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
103 mph
Maximum Speed
121 mph
15.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.3 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
725 ft
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
62 mph
62
mph
mph
469 ft
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
▶ REPLAY
36.06 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
22.66 lb/hp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
36.06 lb/hp
22.66 lb/hp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Fuel Economy
37 mpg
combined
44 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
37 mpg
44 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
28 mpg
city
37 mpg
45 mpg
highway
50 mpg
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
16.9 gal
534 mi
Range
751 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
534 mi
751 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Environmental Impact
121.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
109.1 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
121.2 kWh
109.1 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 5
240 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
224 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD S/S
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
1071 lb
Maximum Payload
1433 lb
13.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
2.9 cu ft








48.8 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
45.1 cu ft