The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (12 - 14) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10)

€ 17,600
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (12 - 14) Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
€ 21,500
 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
€ 17,600
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 21,500

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp is 8.9 inches shorter, 2.5 inches wider and 1.2 inches lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D.
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
58.4
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (12 - 14)
71.8
79.3
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10)
69.3
80.5
71.8 in
Width
69.3 in
79.3 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
80.5 in
58.4 in
Height
59.6 in
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (12 - 14)
104.3
171.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10)
103.7
180.5
171.6 in
Length
180.5 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
103.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
2813 lb
Curb Weight
3395 lb
4189 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4343 lb
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (12 - 14)
Weight Difference:
582 lb
17.14 %
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10)

General

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
DYB
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Straight-three gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
3
Cylinders
4
1 L / 49 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
99 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
138 hp
at 4000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
99 hp
138 hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
125 lb‑ft
at 1500 rpm
Max. Torque
229 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
125 lb‑ft
229 lb‑ft
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D

Performance

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
115 mph
Maximum Speed
127 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
9.6 sec
62 mph 62
mph

571 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

62 mph 62
mph

436 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D

▶ REPLAY
28.41 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
24.6 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
28.41 lb/hp
24.6 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Fuel Economy
50 mpg
combined
37 mpg
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
50 mpg
37 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
41 mpg
city
28 mpg
57 mpg
highway
46 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.6 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
727 mi
Range
582 mi
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
727 mi
582 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Environmental Impact
89 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
129.6 kWh
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
89 kWh
129.6 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 4
175 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
266 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1376 lb
Maximum Payload
948 lb
10.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
8.2 cu ft
32.5 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
38.2 cu ft