The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17)

€ 21,700
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18) Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
€ 18,500
 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
€ 21,700
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 18,500

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp is 8.9 inches shorter, 2.5 inches wider and 1.8 inches lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec.
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
57.8
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18)
71.8
79.3
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17)
69.3
79.9
71.8 in
Width
69.3 in
79.3 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.9 in
57.8 in
Height
59.6 in
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18)
104.3
171.7
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17)
103.7
180.5
171.7 in
Length
180.5 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
103.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
2822 lb
Curb Weight
2965 lb
4189 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
3968 lb
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 18)
Weight Difference:
143 lb
4.82 %
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17)

General

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
DYB
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Straight-three gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
3
Cylinders
4
1 L / 49 cu in
Displacement
1.6 L / 78 cu in
123 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
115 hp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
123 hp
115 hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
125 lb‑ft
at 1400 rpm
Max. Torque
114 lb‑ft
at 4000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
125 lb‑ft
114 lb‑ft
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec

Performance

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
120 mph
Maximum Speed
117 mph
11 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

502 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

62 mph 62
mph

505 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec

▶ REPLAY
22.94 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
25.78 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
22.94 lb/hp
25.78 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Fuel Economy
50 mpg
combined
43 mpg
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
50 mpg
43 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
41 mpg
city
34 mpg
57 mpg
highway
50 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.6 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
727 mi
Range
667 mi
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
727 mi
667 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Environmental Impact
89 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
104.1 kWh
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
89 kWh
104.1 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
174 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
206 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1367 lb
Maximum Payload
1003 lb
10.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
8.2 cu ft
35.7 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
38.2 cu ft