The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (10 - 15)

€ 20,800
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17) Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
€ 24,200
 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (10 - 15) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
€ 20,800
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 24,200

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp is 8.9 inches shorter, 2.5 inches wider and 1.8 inches lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8.
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
57.8
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17)
71.8
79.3
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (10 - 15)
69.3
80.5
71.8 in
Width
69.3 in
79.3 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
80.5 in
57.8 in
Height
59.6 in
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17)
104.3
171.7
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (10 - 15)
103.7
180.5
171.7 in
Length
180.5 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
103.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
2813 lb
Curb Weight
3219 lb
4189 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4189 lb
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17)
Weight Difference:
406 lb
12.61 %
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 CVT-Automatic (10 - 15)

General

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
DYB
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)

Engine

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Straight-three gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
3
Cylinders
4
1 L / 49 cu in
Displacement
1.8 L / 88 cu in
99 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
138 hp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
99 hp
138 hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
125 lb‑ft
at 1400 rpm
Max. Torque
130 lb‑ft
at 4250 rpm
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
125 lb‑ft
130 lb‑ft
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8

Performance

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
115 mph
Maximum Speed
114 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.2 sec
62 mph 62
mph

571 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp

62 mph 62
mph

554 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8

▶ REPLAY
28.41 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
23.33 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
28.41 lb/hp
23.33 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Fuel Economy
55 mpg
combined
33 mpg
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
55 mpg
33 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
43 mpg
city
25 mpg
65 mpg
highway
39 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.6 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
795 mi
Range
509 mi
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
795 mi
509 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Environmental Impact
81.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
136.5 kWh
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
81.4 kWh
136.5 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 5
159 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
269 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1376 lb
Maximum Payload
970 lb
10.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
8.2 cu ft
35.7 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
38.2 cu ft