The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (14 - 18) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

€ 23,700
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (14 - 18) Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
€ 36,000
 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 23,700
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic is 22.5 cm shorter, 6.3 cm wider and 4.6 cm lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo.
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
1469
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (14 - 18)
1823
2015
1515
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
1760
2044
1823 mm
Width
1760 mm
2015 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2044 mm
1469 mm
Height
1515 mm
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (14 - 18)
2650
4360
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
2635
4585
4360 mm
Length
4585 mm
2650 mm
Wheelbase
2635 mm

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
1350 kg
Kerb Weight
No data
1900 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
No data
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic (14 - 18)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

General

Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
DYB
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
2
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1499 CC
Engine Capacity
1998 CC
104 bhp
at 3600 rpm
Power
237 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
104 bhp
237 bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
270 NM
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
343 NM
at 2500 rpm
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
270 NM
343 NM
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Performance

Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
116 mph
Maximum Speed
137 mph
11.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

165 m
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic

62 mph 62
mph

99 m
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

▶ REPLAY
12.98 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
No data
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
12.98 kg/bhp
0 kg/bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Fuel Economy
83 mpg
combined
28 mpg
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
83 mpg
28 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
74 mpg
city
20 mpg
91 mpg
motorway
35 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
53 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
59 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
969 mi
Range
359 mi
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
969 mi
359 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Environmental Impact
70 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
193.3 kWh
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
70 kWh
193.3 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 4 / Euro 5
88 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
243 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
550 kg
Maximum Payload
No data
363 L
Boot Capacity
288 L
1262 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1349 L