The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)

€ 22,500
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14) Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
€ 24,000
 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
€ 22,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 24,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g is 22.7 cm shorter, 6.3 cm wider and 3.1 cm lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec.
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
1484
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14)
1823
2015
1515
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)
1760
2044
1823 mm
Width
1760 mm
2015 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2044 mm
1484 mm
Height
1515 mm
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14)
2650
4358
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)
2635
4585
4358 mm
Length
4585 mm
2650 mm
Wheelbase
2635 mm

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
1350 kg
Kerb Weight
1540 kg
1900 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1970 kg
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14)
Weight Difference:
190 kg
12.34 %
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)

General

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
DYB
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
2
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1560 CC
Engine Capacity
1798 CC
104 bhp
at 3600 rpm
Power
148 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
104 bhp
148 bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
270 NM
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
300 NM
at 2000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
270 NM
300 NM
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec

Performance

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
116 mph
Maximum Speed
127 mph
11.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

164 m
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g

62 mph 62
mph

140 m
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec

▶ REPLAY
12.98 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
10.41 kg/bhp
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
12.98 kg/bhp
10.41 kg/bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Fuel Economy
76 mpg
combined
55 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
76 mpg
55 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
66 mpg
city
45 mpg
83 mpg
motorway
61 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
53 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
59 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
890 mi
Range
719 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
890 mi
719 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Environmental Impact
76.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
104.9 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
76.1 kWh
104.9 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
99 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
137 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
550 kg
Maximum Payload
430 kg
363 L
Boot Capacity
288 L
1148 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1349 L