The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

€ 21,900
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14) Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
€ 36,000
 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 21,900
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT is 8.9 inches shorter, 2.5 inches wider and 1.2 inches lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo.
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
58.4
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14)
71.8
79.3
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
69.3
80.5
71.8 in
Width
69.3 in
79.3 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
80.5 in
58.4 in
Height
59.6 in
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14)
104.3
171.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
103.7
180.5
171.6 in
Length
180.5 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
103.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
2901 lb
Curb Weight
No data
4023 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
No data
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

General

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
DYB
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.6 L / 78 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
123 hp
at 6300 rpm
Power
237 hp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
123 hp
237 hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
117 lb‑ft
at 4000 rpm
Max. Torque
253 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
117 lb‑ft
253 lb‑ft
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Performance

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
120 mph
Maximum Speed
137 mph
11.7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

535 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

62 mph 62
mph

325 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

▶ REPLAY
23.59 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
No data
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
23.59 lb/hp
0 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Fuel Economy
37 mpg
combined
23 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
37 mpg
23 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
27 mpg
city
17 mpg
48 mpg
highway
29 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.6 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
542 mi
Range
359 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
542 mi
359 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Environmental Impact
119.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
193.3 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
119.4 kWh
193.3 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 4 / Euro 5
235 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
391 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1122 lb
Maximum Payload
No data
10.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
8.2 cu ft
32.5 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
38.2 cu ft