The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi Powershift (11 - 14) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

€ 28,200
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi Powershift (11 - 14) Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
€ 36,000
 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 28,200
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi is 8.9 inches shorter, 2.5 inches wider and 1.2 inches lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo.
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
58.4
Blueprint Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi Powershift (11 - 14)
71.8
79.3
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
69.3
80.5
71.8 in
Width
69.3 in
79.3 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
80.5 in
58.4 in
Height
59.6 in
Blueprint Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi Powershift (11 - 14)
104.3
171.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
103.7
180.5
171.6 in
Length
180.5 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
103.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
3221 lb
Curb Weight
No data
4519 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
No data
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi Powershift (11 - 14)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

General

Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
DYB
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Diesel
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
161 hp
at 3750 rpm
Power
237 hp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
161 hp
237 hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
251 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
253 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
251 lb‑ft
253 lb‑ft
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Performance

Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
134 mph
Maximum Speed
137 mph
8.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

407 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi

62 mph 62
mph

325 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

▶ REPLAY
20.01 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
No data
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
20.01 lb/hp
0 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Fuel Economy
45 mpg
combined
23 mpg
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
45 mpg
23 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
36 mpg
city
17 mpg
55 mpg
highway
29 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.6 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
717 mi
Range
359 mi
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
717 mi
359 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Environmental Impact
107 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
193.3 kWh
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
107 kWh
193.3 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 4 / Euro 5
216 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
391 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1299 lb
Maximum Payload
No data
10.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
8.2 cu ft
32.5 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
38.2 cu ft