The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue (18 - ..) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

€ 27,900
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue (18 - ..) Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
€ 36,000
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 27,900
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,000

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue is 7.8 inches shorter, 2.6 inches wider and 1.3 inches lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo.
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
58.3
Blueprint Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue (18 - ..)
71.9
77.9
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
69.3
80.5
71.9 in
Width
69.3 in
77.9 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
80.5 in
58.3 in
Height
59.6 in
Blueprint Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue (18 - ..)
106.3
172.7
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
103.7
180.5
172.7 in
Length
180.5 in
106.3 in
Wheelbase
103.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
3005 lb
Curb Weight
No data
4178 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
No data
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue (18 - ..)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

General

Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
DEH
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Diesel
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
2
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.5 L / 73 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
118 hp
at 3600 rpm
Power
237 hp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
118 hp
237 hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
221 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
253 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
221 lb‑ft
253 lb‑ft
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Performance

Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
119 mph
Maximum Speed
137 mph
10.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

492 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue

62 mph 62
mph

325 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

 REPLAY
25.47 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
No data
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
25.47 lb/hp
0 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Fuel Economy
67 mpg
combined
23 mpg
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
67 mpg
23 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
60 mpg
city
17 mpg
71 mpg
highway
29 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
12.4 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.6 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
835 mi
Range
359 mi
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
835 mi
359 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Environmental Impact
71.9 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
193.3 kWh
Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
71.9 kWh
193.3 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI
Emission Standard
Euro 4 / Euro 5
198 g/mi (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
391 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus Active 1.5 EcoBlue
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1173 lb
Maximum Payload
No data
10.6 cu ft
Trunk Volume
8.2 cu ft
38.3 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
38.2 cu ft