The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus Sedan 1.5 EcoBoost Automatic (14 - 17) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

€ 28,700
Ford Focus Sedan 1.5 EcoBoost Automatic (14 - 17) Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
€ 36,000
 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 28,700
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp is 1.3 inches shorter, 2.5 inches wider and 0.8 inches lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo.
Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
57.8
Blueprint Ford Focus Sedan 1.5 EcoBoost Automatic (14 - 17)
71.8
79.3
58.7
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
69.3
80.5
71.8 in
Width
69.3 in
79.3 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
80.5 in
57.8 in
Height
58.7 in
Blueprint Ford Focus Sedan 1.5 EcoBoost Automatic (14 - 17)
104.3
178.7
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
103.7
179.9
178.7 in
Length
179.9 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
103.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
2994 lb
Curb Weight
No data
4189 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
No data
Ford Focus Sedan 1.5 EcoBoost Automatic (14 - 17)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

General

Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
DYB
Generation
CY0
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.5 L / 73 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
180 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
237 hp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
180 hp
237 hp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
177 lb‑ft
at 1600 rpm
Max. Torque
253 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
177 lb‑ft
253 lb‑ft
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo

Performance

Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
138 mph
Maximum Speed
143 mph
9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7 sec
62 mph 62
mph

410 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

62 mph 62
mph

318 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo

▶ REPLAY
16.63 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
No data
Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
16.63 lb/hp
0 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Fuel Economy
41 mpg
combined
24 mpg
Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
41 mpg
24 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
31 mpg
city
17 mpg
47 mpg
highway
30 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
14.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
589 mi
Range
342 mi
Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
589 mi
342 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Environmental Impact
109.9 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
189.4 kWh
Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
109.9 kWh
189.4 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 4 / Euro 5
216 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
383 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
1195 lb
Maximum Payload
No data
13.5 cu ft
Trunk Volume
9.1 cu ft
No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data