The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12) vs. Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)

€ 21,000
Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12) Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
€ 30,800
 Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..) Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
€ 21,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 30,800

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT is 12.6 cm shorter, 2.8 cm wider and 4.4 cm taller than the Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid.
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
1484
Blueprint Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12)
1823
2015
1440
Blueprint Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)
1795
2028
1823 mm
Width
1795 mm
2015 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2028 mm
1484 mm
Height
1440 mm
Blueprint Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12)
2650
4534
Blueprint Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)
2725
4660
4534 mm
Length
4660 mm
2650 mm
Wheelbase
2725 mm

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
1296 kg
Kerb Weight
1426 kg
1825 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1927 kg
Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12)
Weight Difference:
130 kg
9.12 %
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)

General

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
DYB
Generation
BP
Saloon
Car Body Style
Saloon
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Straight-four petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
4-cylinder mild hybrid petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1596 CC
Engine Capacity
1998 CC
123 bhp
at 6300 rpm
Power
178 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
123 bhp
178 bhp
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
159 NM
at 4000 rpm
Max. Torque
224 NM
at 3000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
159 NM
224 NM
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid

Performance

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
123 mph
Maximum Speed
134 mph
11 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.6 sec
62 mph 62
mph

153 m
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

62 mph 62
mph

119 m
0.000 sec

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid

▶ REPLAY
10.54 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
8.01 kg/bhp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
10.54 kg/bhp
8.01 kg/bhp
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Fuel Economy
47 mpg
combined
54 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
47 mpg
54 mpg
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
35 mpg
city
46 mpg
59 mpg
motorway
61 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
55 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
51 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
570 mi
Range
610 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
570 mi
610 mi
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Environmental Impact
113.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
98.5 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
113.6 kWh
98.5 kWh
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
139 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
142 g/km (WLTP)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
529 kg
Maximum Payload
501 kg
475 L
Boot Capacity
450 L
No data
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
No data