The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT (14 - 17) vs. Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)

€ 17,400
Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT (14 - 17) Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
€ 30,800
 Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..) Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
€ 17,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 30,800

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT is 4.8 inches shorter, 1.1 inches wider and 1.1 inches taller than the Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid.
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
57.8
Blueprint Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT (14 - 17)
71.8
79.3
56.7
Blueprint Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)
70.7
79.8
71.8 in
Width
70.7 in
79.3 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.8 in
57.8 in
Height
56.7 in
Blueprint Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT (14 - 17)
104.3
178.7
Blueprint Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)
107.3
183.5
178.7 in
Length
183.5 in
104.3 in
Wheelbase
107.3 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
2831 lb
Curb Weight
3144 lb
4023 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4248 lb
Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT (14 - 17)
Weight Difference:
313 lb
9.96 %
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)

General

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
DYB
Generation
BP
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
4-cylinder mild hybrid gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.6 L / 78 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
84 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
178 hp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
84 hp
178 hp
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
104 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Max. Torque
165 lb‑ft
at 3000 rpm
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
104 lb‑ft
165 lb‑ft
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid

Performance

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
107 mph
Maximum Speed
134 mph
15 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.6 sec
62 mph 62
mph

682 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

62 mph 62
mph

390 ft
0.000 sec

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid

▶ REPLAY
33.7 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
17.66 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
33.7 lb/hp
17.66 lb/hp
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Fuel Economy
39 mpg
combined
45 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
39 mpg
45 mpg
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
28 mpg
city
39 mpg
50 mpg
highway
51 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
13.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
570 mi
Range
610 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
570 mi
610 mi
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Environmental Impact
113.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
98.5 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
113.6 kWh
98.5 kWh
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
224 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
229 g/mi (WLTP)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
1193 lb
Maximum Payload
1105 lb
13.5 cu ft
Trunk Volume
12.7 cu ft
No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data