The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost 4x4 Automatic (13 - 14) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)

€ 30,300
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost 4x4 Automatic (13 - 14) Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
€ 40,300
 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15) Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
€ 30,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,300

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost is 6.3 inches longer, 2.4 inches narrower and 2.6 inches taller than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4.
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
67
Blueprint Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost 4x4 Automatic (13 - 14)
72.4
82.1
64.4
Blueprint Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)
74.8
82.7
72.4 in
Width
74.8 in
82.1 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
82.7 in
67 in
Height
64.4 in
Blueprint Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost 4x4 Automatic (13 - 14)
105.9
178.1
Blueprint Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)
104.7
171.9
178.1 in
Length
171.9 in
105.9 in
Wheelbase
104.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
3708 lb
Curb Weight
3616 lb
4960 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5181 lb
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost 4x4 Automatic (13 - 14)
Weight Difference:
93 lb
2.51 %
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)

General

Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
DM2
Generation
LV
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.6 L / 78 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
180 hp
at 5700 rpm
Power
237 hp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
180 hp
237 hp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
177 lb‑ft
at 1600 rpm
Max. Torque
251 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
177 lb‑ft
251 lb‑ft
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

Performance

Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
124 mph
Maximum Speed
135 mph
9.7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.6 sec
62 mph 62
mph

443 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost

62 mph 62
mph

348 ft
0.000 sec

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

▶ REPLAY
20.6 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
15.26 lb/hp
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
20.6 lb/hp
15.26 lb/hp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Fuel Economy
31 mpg
combined
27 mpg
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
31 mpg
27 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
23 mpg
city
20 mpg
37 mpg
highway
34 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
484 mi
Range
500 mi
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
484 mi
500 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Environmental Impact
145.8 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
164.8 kWh
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
145.8 kWh
164.8 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
288 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
320 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1252 lb
Maximum Payload
1565 lb
13.6 cu ft
Trunk Volume
16.3 cu ft
46.8 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
40.9 cu ft