The Comparative Analysis :
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4x4 (13 - 14) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e Automatic (20 - ..)
€ 30,400

€ 50,800

€ 30,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 50,800
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi is 15.3 cm longer, 6.2 cm narrower and 5.2 cm taller than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e.
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
1701
1838
2086
1649
1900
2100
1838 mm
Width
1900 mm
2086 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2100 mm
1701 mm
Height
1649 mm
2690
4524
2681
4371
4524 mm
Length
4371 mm
2690 mm
Wheelbase
2681 mm
Vehicle Weight
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
1692 kg
Kerb Weight
2157 kg
2250 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2660 kg

Weight Difference:
465 kg
21.56 %

General
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
DM2
Generation
L551
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

Permanent all-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive

6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
3-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
3
1997 CC
Engine Capacity
1497 CC
161 bhp
at 3750 rpm
Power
305 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
161 bhp
305 bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
340 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
540 NM
at 2000 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
340 NM
540 NM
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Performance
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
123 mph
Maximum Speed
132 mph
9.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
6.4 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
138 m
0.000 sec

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
62 mph
62
mph
mph
89 m
0.000 sec

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
▶ REPLAY
10.51 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
7.07 kg/bhp
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
10.51 kg/bhp
7.07 kg/bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Fuel Economy
48 mpg
combined
149 mpg
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
48 mpg
149 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
39 mpg
city
No data
55 mpg
motorway
No data
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
43 L
632 mi
Range
1406 mi
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
632 mi
1406 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Environmental Impact
121.3 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
36 kWh
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
121.3 kWh
36 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
154 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
43 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
558 kg
Maximum Payload
503 kg
481 L
Boot Capacity
472 L











1653 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1156 L