The Comparative Analysis :
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4x4 (13 - 14) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4 Automatic (15 - 18)
€ 30,400

€ 43,900

€ 30,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 43,900
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi is 6.1 inches longer, 2.4 inches narrower and 1.6 inches taller than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4.
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
67
72.4
82.1
65.4
74.8
82.7
72.4 in
Width
74.8 in
82.1 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
82.7 in
67 in
Height
65.4 in
105.9
178.1
104.7
172
178.1 in
Length
172 in
105.9 in
Wheelbase
104.7 in
Vehicle Weight
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
3730 lb
Curb Weight
3862 lb
4960 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
5181 lb

Weight Difference:
132 lb
3.42 %

General
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
DM2
Generation
L538
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded

Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)

6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
9-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
161 hp
at 3750 rpm
Power
237 hp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
161 hp
237 hp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
251 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
251 lb‑ft
at 1250 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
251 lb‑ft
251 lb‑ft
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
Performance
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
123 mph
Maximum Speed
137 mph
9.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.3 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
453 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
62 mph
62
mph
mph
331 ft
0.000 sec

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
▶ REPLAY
23.17 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
16.3 lb/hp
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
23.17 lb/hp
16.3 lb/hp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
Fuel Economy
40 mpg
combined
29 mpg
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
40 mpg
29 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
33 mpg
city
23 mpg
46 mpg
highway
34 mpg
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.2 gal
632 mi
Range
523 mi
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
632 mi
523 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
Environmental Impact
121.3 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
155.3 kWh
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
121.3 kWh
155.3 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6
248 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
298 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Si4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1230 lb
Maximum Payload
1318 lb
13.6 cu ft
Trunk Volume
16.3 cu ft










46.8 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
40.9 cu ft