The Comparative Analysis :
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4x4 Powershift (13 - 14) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)
€ 32,200

€ 40,300

€ 32,200
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,300
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi is 15.9 cm longer, 6.2 cm narrower and 6.6 cm taller than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4.
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
1701
1838
2086
1635
1900
2100
1838 mm
Width
1900 mm
2086 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2100 mm
1701 mm
Height
1635 mm
2690
4524
2660
4365
4524 mm
Length
4365 mm
2690 mm
Wheelbase
2660 mm
Vehicle Weight
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
1707 kg
Kerb Weight
1640 kg
2230 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2350 kg

Weight Difference:
67 kg
3.93 %

General
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
DM2
Generation
LV
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

Permanent all-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive

6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Straight-four diesel engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1997 CC
Engine Capacity
1999 CC
161 bhp
at 3750 rpm
Power
237 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
161 bhp
237 bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
340 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
340 NM
at 1750 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
340 NM
340 NM
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Performance
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
122 mph
Maximum Speed
135 mph
10.4 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.6 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
144 m
0.000 sec

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
62 mph
62
mph
mph
106 m
0.000 sec

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
▶ REPLAY
10.6 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
6.92 kg/bhp
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
10.6 kg/bhp
6.92 kg/bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Fuel Economy
46 mpg
combined
32 mpg
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
46 mpg
32 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
38 mpg
city
24 mpg
51 mpg
motorway
41 mpg
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
601 mi
Range
500 mi
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
601 mi
500 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Environmental Impact
127.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
164.8 kWh
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
127.6 kWh
164.8 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
162 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
199 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
523 kg
Maximum Payload
710 kg
481 L
Boot Capacity
575 L










1653 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1445 L