The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4x4 Powershift (13 - 14) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e Automatic (20 - ..)

€ 32,200
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4x4 Powershift (13 - 14) Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
€ 50,800
 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e Automatic (20 - ..) Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
€ 32,200
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 50,800

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi is 6 inches longer, 2.4 inches narrower and 2 inches taller than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e.
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
67
Blueprint Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4x4 Powershift (13 - 14)
72.4
82.1
64.9
Blueprint Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e Automatic (20 - ..)
74.8
82.7
72.4 in
Width
74.8 in
82.1 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
82.7 in
67 in
Height
64.9 in
Blueprint Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4x4 Powershift (13 - 14)
105.9
178.1
Blueprint Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e Automatic (20 - ..)
105.6
172.1
178.1 in
Length
172.1 in
105.9 in
Wheelbase
105.6 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
3763 lb
Curb Weight
4755 lb
4916 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5864 lb
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi 4x4 Powershift (13 - 14)
Weight Difference:
992 lb
20.86 %
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e Automatic (20 - ..)

General

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
DM2
Generation
L551
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
3-cylinder plug-in hybrid gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
3
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
1.5 L / 73 cu in
161 hp
at 3750 rpm
Power
305 hp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
161 hp
305 hp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
251 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
398 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
251 lb‑ft
398 lb‑ft
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e

Performance

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
122 mph
Maximum Speed
132 mph
10.4 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
6.4 sec
62 mph 62
mph

472 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi

62 mph 62
mph

292 ft
0.000 sec

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e

▶ REPLAY
23.37 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
15.59 lb/hp
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
23.37 lb/hp
15.59 lb/hp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Fuel Economy
38 mpg
combined
124 mpg
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
38 mpg
124 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
32 mpg
city
No data
43 mpg
highway
No data
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
11.4 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
601 mi
Range
1406 mi
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
601 mi
1406 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Environmental Impact
127.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
36 kWh
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
127.6 kWh
36 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
261 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
69 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1153 lb
Maximum Payload
1109 lb
13.6 cu ft
Trunk Volume
13.4 cu ft
46.8 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
32.7 cu ft