The Comparative Analysis :
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 (08 - 12) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e Automatic (20 - ..)
€ 28,800

€ 50,800

€ 28,800
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 50,800
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo is 7.2 cm longer, 5.8 cm narrower and 2.8 cm taller than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e.
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
1677
1842
2042
1649
1900
2100
1842 mm
Width
1900 mm
2042 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2100 mm
1677 mm
Height
1649 mm
2690
4443
2681
4371
4443 mm
Length
4371 mm
2690 mm
Wheelbase
2681 mm
Vehicle Weight
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
1608 kg
Kerb Weight
2157 kg
2130 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2660 kg

Weight Difference:
549 kg
25.45 %

General
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
DM2
Generation
L551
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

Permanent all-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive

6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Straight-five petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
3-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
5
Cylinders
3
2521 CC
Engine Capacity
1497 CC
197 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
305 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
197 bhp
305 bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
320 NM
at 1600 rpm
Max. Torque
540 NM
at 2000 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
320 NM
540 NM
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Performance
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
130 mph
Maximum Speed
132 mph
8.2 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
6.4 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
114 m
0.000 sec

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
62 mph
62
mph
mph
89 m
0.000 sec

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
▶ REPLAY
8.16 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
7.07 kg/bhp
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
8.16 kg/bhp
7.07 kg/bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Fuel Economy
29 mpg
combined
149 mpg
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
29 mpg
149 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
20 mpg
city
No data
37 mpg
motorway
No data
58 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
43 L
364 mi
Range
1406 mi
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
364 mi
1406 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Environmental Impact
187.5 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
36 kWh
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
187.5 kWh
36 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Euro 4 / Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
234 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
43 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
522 kg
Maximum Payload
503 kg
410 L
Boot Capacity
472 L










1405 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1156 L