The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 EcoBoost Automatic (15 - 18) vs. Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 18)

€ 42,400
Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 EcoBoost Automatic (15 - 18) Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
€ 41,300
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 18) Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
€ 42,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 41,300

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost is 9.3 inches longer, 0.6 inches narrower and 0.1 inches lower than the Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance.
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
58.3
Blueprint Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 EcoBoost Automatic (15 - 18)
72.9
83.5
58.4
Blueprint Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 18)
73.5
82.6
72.9 in
Width
73.5 in
83.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
82.6 in
58.3 in
Height
58.4 in
Blueprint Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 EcoBoost Automatic (15 - 18)
112.2
191.8
Blueprint Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 18)
109.3
182.5
191.8 in
Length
182.5 in
112.2 in
Wheelbase
109.3 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
3444 lb
Curb Weight
3622 lb
4894 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4652 lb
Ford Mondeo Sedan 2.0 EcoBoost Automatic (15 - 18)
Weight Difference:
179 lb
4.94 %
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 18)

General

Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
BA7
Generation
F
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Code
B4204T11
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
200 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
250 hp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
200 hp
250 hp
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
221 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
295 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
221 lb‑ft
295 lb‑ft
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance

Performance

Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
144 mph
Maximum Speed
143 mph
8.7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
6.2 sec
62 mph 62
mph

397 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost

62 mph 62
mph

282 ft
0.000 sec

Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance

 REPLAY
17.22 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
14.49 lb/hp
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
17.22 lb/hp
14.49 lb/hp
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
Fuel Economy
32 mpg
combined
38 mpg
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
32 mpg
38 mpg
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
23 mpg
city
27 mpg
41 mpg
highway
48 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
16.6 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
529 mi
Range
682 mi
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
529 mi
682 mi
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
Environmental Impact
140.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
117.5 kWh
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
140.2 kWh
117.5 kWh
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
275 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
233 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 T5 Polestar Performance
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
1451 lb
Maximum Payload
1030 lb
14.9 cu ft
Trunk Volume
10.8 cu ft
No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data