The Comparative Analysis :

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..) vs. Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance AWD Geartronic (17 - 17)

€ 35,700
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..) Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
€ 56,700
 Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance AWD Geartronic (17 - 17) Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
€ 35,700
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 56,700

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid is 8.8 cm shorter, 4.7 cm narrower and 2.1 cm taller than the Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance.
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
1679
Blueprint Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)
1855
2117
1658
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance AWD Geartronic (17 - 17)
1902
2117
1855 mm
Width
1902 mm
2117 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2117 mm
1679 mm
Height
1658 mm
Blueprint Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)
2663
4600
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance AWD Geartronic (17 - 17)
2865
4688
4600 mm
Length
4688 mm
2663 mm
Wheelbase
2865 mm

Vehicle Weight

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
1614 kg
Kerb Weight
2162 kg
2240 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2490 kg
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)
Weight Difference:
548 kg
25.35 %
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance AWD Geartronic (17 - 17)

General

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
RW
Generation
U
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
4-cylinder full hybrid petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with gas turbine com­pres­sor
Engine Code
B4204T27
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1993 CC
Engine Capacity
1969 CC
181 bhp
at 0 rpm
Power
330 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
181 bhp
330 bhp
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
315 NM
at 0 rpm
Max. Torque
440 NM
at 4500 rpm
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
315 NM
440 NM
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance

Performance

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
112 mph
Maximum Speed
143 mph
8.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
5.8 sec
62 mph 62
mph

122 m
0.000 sec

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid

62 mph 62
mph

81 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance

▶ REPLAY
8.92 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
6.55 kg/bhp
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
8.92 kg/bhp
6.55 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
Fuel Economy
53 mpg
combined
37 mpg
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
53 mpg
37 mpg
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
56 mpg
city
29 mpg
52 mpg
motorway
43 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
57 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
71 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
668 mi
Range
573 mi
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
668 mi
573 mi
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
Environmental Impact
100.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
145.8 kWh
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
100.4 kWh
145.8 kWh
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
120 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
176 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T6 Polestar Performance
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
626 kg
Maximum Payload
328 kg
497 L
Boot Capacity
505 L
1694 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1432 L