The Comparative Analysis :

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..) vs. Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18)

€ 35,700
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..) Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
€ 67,000
 Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18) Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
€ 35,700
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 67,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid is 8.8 cm shorter, 4.7 cm narrower and 2.1 cm taller than the Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine.
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
1679
Blueprint Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)
1855
2117
1658
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18)
1902
2117
1855 mm
Width
1902 mm
2117 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2117 mm
1679 mm
Height
1658 mm
Blueprint Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)
2663
4600
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18)
2865
4688
4600 mm
Length
4688 mm
2663 mm
Wheelbase
2865 mm

Vehicle Weight

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
1614 kg
Kerb Weight
2195 kg
2240 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2660 kg
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)
Weight Difference:
581 kg
26.47 %
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (17 - 18)

General

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
RW
Generation
U
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with automatic engagement
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
4-cylinder full hybrid petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with gas turbine com­pres­sor
Engine Code
B4204T35
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1993 CC
Engine Capacity
1969 CC
181 bhp
at 0 rpm
Power
387 bhp
at 0 rpm
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
181 bhp
387 bhp
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
315 NM
at 0 rpm
Max. Torque
640 NM
at 0 rpm
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
315 NM
640 NM
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine

Performance

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
112 mph
Maximum Speed
143 mph
8.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
5.3 sec
62 mph 62
mph

122 m
0.000 sec

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid

62 mph 62
mph

74 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine

▶ REPLAY
8.92 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
5.67 kg/bhp
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
8.92 kg/bhp
5.67 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Fuel Economy
53 mpg
combined
135 mpg
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
53 mpg
135 mpg
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
56 mpg
city
No data
52 mpg
motorway
No data
Kraftstoffanzeige
57 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
50 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
668 mi
Range
1479 mi
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
668 mi
1479 mi
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Environmental Impact
100.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
39.8 kWh
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
100.4 kWh
39.8 kWh
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
120 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
49 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
626 kg
Maximum Payload
465 kg
497 L
Boot Capacity
505 L
1694 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1432 L