The Comparative Analysis :
KIA Optima 2.0 (13 - 15) vs. Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo AWD Automatic (12 - 18)
€ 25,000
€ 42,000
€ 25,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 42,000
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The KIA Optima 2.0 is considerably bigger in every dimension. It's 20.1 cm longer, 2.5 cm wider and 2.8 cm taller than the Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo.
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
1455
1830
2030
1427
1805
2005
1830 mm
Width
1805 mm
2030 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2005 mm
1455 mm
Height
1427 mm
2795
4845
2775
4644
4845 mm
Length
4644 mm
2795 mm
Wheelbase
2775 mm
Vehicle Weight
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
1498 kg
Kerb Weight
1605 kg
2000 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2130 kg
Weight Difference:
107 kg
6.67 %
General
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
TF
Generation
ATS
Saloon
Car Body Style
Saloon
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Super Unleaded (98 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission
Engine
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Series
GM 2.0L Ecotec Turbo I4
Engine Code
LTG
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1999 CC
Engine Capacity
1998 CC
163 bhp
at 6500 rpm
Power
272 bhp
at 5500 rpm
KIA Optima 2.0
163 bhp
272 bhp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
196 NM
at 4800 rpm
Max. Torque
353 NM
at 1700 rpm
KIA Optima 2.0
196 NM
353 NM
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Performance
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
130 mph
Maximum Speed
143 mph
9.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
6.1 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
132 m
0.000 sec
KIA Optima 2.0
62 mph
62
mph
mph
85 m
0.000 sec
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
▶ REPLAY
9.19 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
5.9 kg/bhp
KIA Optima 2.0
9.19 kg/bhp
5.9 kg/bhp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Fuel Economy / Emissions
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Fuel Economy
40 mpg
combined
34 mpg
KIA Optima 2.0
40 mpg
34 mpg
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
30 mpg
city
24 mpg
50 mpg
motorway
No data
70 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
63 L
621 mi
Range
466 mi
KIA Optima 2.0
621 mi
466 mi
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Environmental Impact
132.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
159.2 kWh
KIA Optima 2.0
132.6 kWh
159.2 kWh
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
162 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
195 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
502 kg
Maximum Payload
525 kg
505 L
Boot Capacity
381 L
No data
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
No data
